- CND’s new briefing shows Trident replacement costs have risen to a staggering £205 billion
- The briefing combines all government spending on Trident and shows the cost has doubled since it was calculated in 2014
- Read the summary below or download our fully referenced briefing as a PDF
- Help us get the word out Share the briefing on Twitter using the hashtag #205andRising
- Please join CND to support our work – help us bring an end to this madness
A Trillion Dollars for Nuclear Weapons – Dangerous & Costly in So Many Ways
Instead of pursuing negotiations for worldwide abolition of nuclear weapons, the US is planning a total overhaul of its nuclear weapons program, including new generations of nuclear warheads, bombers, land-based missiles, air-launched missiles and submarine. The projected price tag? About $1 trillion over the next thirty years, or an average of $30 billion a year until the middle of the 21st century! For more on US plans for GDAMS 2016, see FULL TEXT
Meteoric rise of SNP shows forceful rejection of Trident in Scotland
Media release by Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament UK
The spectacular gains of the Scottish National Party (SNP) in the general election are a stark indicator of opposition to the UK’s Trident nuclear weapons system, which is based in Scotland, the Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament has said.
The meteoric rise of the anti-Trident SNP has seen their number grow from 6 MPs in the previous parliament to 56 MPs, in an unprecedented election which saw swings of almost 40% to the SNP in some seats. This huge influx comes ahead of the final vote on whether or not to replace Britain’s ageing nuclear weapons system, expected in early 2016. Continue reading –>
Musicians and scientists join call to scrap Trident nuclear deterrent
By Daniel Boffey
Decommissioning Trident nuclear weapons would be popular with voters and supported by a majority of candidates standing in the general election, luminaries from music, the arts and the legal world have claimed. Continue reading–>
GDAMS day statement by ICAN – The Bill for the Bomb
According to SIPRI’s latest report, issued on Global day of Action on Military Spending, world military expenditure totaled $1.75 trillion in 2013, which amounted to 2.5% of world GDP. In 2011, it was estimated that $105.9 billion was spent on nuclear weapons, and a recent study from the James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies shows that the US alone will spend over one trillion dollars over the next thirty years on maintaining, replacing, and upgrading existing nuclear weapons systems.
We are repeatedly assured by the nuclear-armed states that a gradual, step-by-step approach to disarmament is the only way forward, and any alternative initiatives are ‘distractions’ that threaten to derail the ‘progress’ made. However, nuclear-armed states continuously redefine any agreed disarmament objectives, throwing up smoke screens and pouring millions of taxpayer dollars into weapons that would cause an instant humanitarian catastrophe if ever detonated.
With the existence of nuclear weapons there is always the chance of an accident – Eric Schlosser’s recent book Command and Control makes it clear that the US grossly under-reported the number of serious accidents involving nuclear weapons. In many instances it was either extraordinary bravery or sheer luck that prevented the unthinkable from happening. Lest we think that the lessons have been learned, we need only refer to the seemingly endless list of scandals involving those tasked with the supervision of nuclear weapons. Meanwhile, policies of “nuclear deterrence” and military doctrines of nuclear-armed states make the use of nuclear weapons an ongoing potential threat.
Click here to read the complete article.